Asana Bundle

Who Really Owns Asana?
Understanding the Asana SWOT Analysis is crucial, but have you ever wondered about the power dynamics behind the scenes? The ownership structure of a company like Asana, a leader in collaborative work management, dictates its strategic direction and ultimate success. Unveiling "Who owns Asana" provides critical insights for investors, competitors, and anyone interested in the company's future.

This exploration into Asana's ownership will examine the founders,
Who Founded Asana?
The project management platform, was founded in December 2008. The vision for the company came from Dustin Moskovitz and Justin Rosenstein, who aimed to solve inefficiencies they observed in workplace collaboration. This article delves into the company's founders and early ownership structure.
Dustin Moskovitz, a co-founder of Facebook, and Justin Rosenstein, an early Facebook employee, are the key founders of the company. Their experience at Facebook highlighted the need for better tools to manage 'work about work'. This insight led them to create a platform designed to streamline team coordination and project management.
Early investments played a crucial role in shaping the company's ownership landscape. These initial investments provided the financial backing needed to develop and launch the platform, setting the stage for its growth.
Dustin Moskovitz and Justin Rosenstein founded the company in December 2008. Moskovitz co-founded Facebook, and Rosenstein was an early Facebook employee.
The seed round in April 2009 raised $1.2 million. This initial funding helped kickstart the company's operations and development.
The Series A round in November 2009 brought in $9 million. Benchmark led this round, with participation from other investors.
Andreessen Horowitz and Mitch Kapor were among the early investors. These investors provided both capital and strategic guidance.
Peter Thiel joined the board after the $28 million Series B round in July 2012. Thiel's involvement brought significant experience in the tech industry.
Prior to the direct listing, the founders and their affiliates held approximately 67.8% of the voting power. This concentrated control in the hands of the founders.
The company's ownership structure has historically concentrated voting power with its founders and early investors. As of July 31, 2020, the holders of Class B common stock controlled approximately 98.8% of the voting power. This structure ensured that Dustin Moskovitz and Justin Rosenstein, along with other key stakeholders, maintained significant influence over the company's strategic decisions. For more insights on the competitive landscape, check out the Competitors Landscape of Asana.
Asana SWOT Analysis
- Complete SWOT Breakdown
- Fully Customizable
- Editable in Excel & Word
- Professional Formatting
- Investor-Ready Format

How Has Asana’s Ownership Changed Over Time?
The ownership structure of the company has evolved considerably since its inception, shaped by several funding rounds and its initial public offering (IPO). The company went public on September 30, 2020, through a direct listing on the NYSE, opening at $27 and closing its first day at $28.80. At the time of its direct listing, the company had a fully diluted market value of $5.3 billion. As of June 13, 2025, the company's market capitalization is approximately $3.10 billion.
Key funding events significantly impacted the company's ownership. Benchmark led a $9 million Series A round in November 2009. Founders Fund led a $28 million Series B round in July 2012. In March 2016, the company raised $50 million in a Series C round, valuing the company at $600 million. Generation Investment Management led a $75 million Series D round in January 2018, followed by a $50 million Series E round in November 2018. These rounds brought in substantial investments and shaped the company's ownership landscape.
Funding Round | Date | Amount Raised |
---|---|---|
Series A | November 2009 | $9 million |
Series B | July 2012 | $28 million |
Series C | March 2016 | $50 million |
Series D | January 2018 | $75 million |
Series E | November 2018 | $50 million |
Currently, the company's major stakeholders include Dustin Moskovitz, the CEO and co-founder, who holds a significant percentage of the shares outstanding. As of June 12, 2024, he held 53% of the shares, giving him substantial control. Justin Rosenstein, the co-founder, holds a notable stake as well, reported at 9.1% of shares outstanding as of June 12, 2024. Institutional investors, such as Vanguard Group Inc., Voya Investment Management LLC, and BlackRock, Inc., also hold considerable shares. Voya Investment Management LLC held 5.1% of the company's stock as of October 8, 2024. Venture capital firms like Benchmark, Generation Investment Management, and Founders Fund, who were early investors, still hold significant stakes.
The company's ownership is a mix of founders, institutional investors, and venture capital firms. The founders, Dustin Moskovitz and Justin Rosenstein, retain significant control. This ownership structure impacts the company's strategic decisions and governance.
- Dustin Moskovitz, as CEO and co-founder, is the largest shareholder.
- Institutional investors like Vanguard and BlackRock hold substantial shares.
- Venture capital firms, including Benchmark and Founders Fund, were early investors.
- The dual-class share structure gives founders significant voting power.
Asana PESTLE Analysis
- Covers All 6 PESTLE Categories
- No Research Needed – Save Hours of Work
- Built by Experts, Trusted by Consultants
- Instant Download, Ready to Use
- 100% Editable, Fully Customizable

Who Sits on Asana’s Board?
The current board of directors at Asana plays a critical role in guiding the company. As of June 4, 2025, the board comprises a mix of founders, representatives from major shareholders, and independent members. This structure helps to balance the interests of various stakeholders, ensuring both strategic direction and oversight.
The board includes key figures such as Dustin Moskovitz, the Chairman and Co-Founder, and Justin Rosenstein, also a Co-Founder and Director. Other notable members include Adam D'Angelo, Lorrie Norrington, Krista Anderson-Copperman, Marc Boroditsky, Sydney Carey, Matt Cohler, and Andrew Lindsay. This diverse group brings a wealth of experience in technology, finance, and go-to-market strategies.
Board Member | Title | Affiliation |
---|---|---|
Dustin Moskovitz | Chairman and Co-Founder | |
Justin Rosenstein | Director and Co-Founder | |
Adam D'Angelo | Director | |
Lorrie Norrington | Director | Operating Partner at Lead Edge Capital |
Krista Anderson-Copperman | Board Member and Advisor | Venture Partner at Technology Crossover Ventures (TCV) |
Marc Boroditsky | Director | |
Sydney Carey | Director | Chief Financial Officer of Avalara |
Matt Cohler | Director | General Partner at Benchmark Capital |
Andrew Lindsay | Director | Corporate Vice President, AI, Data, and Azure, Business Development at Microsoft |
Asana operates with a dual-class share structure, which significantly affects the company's voting power. This structure concentrates voting control with early investors, primarily the founders and insiders. As of July 31, 2020, insiders held approximately 67.8% of the total voting power. Dustin Moskovitz, as of June 12, 2024, held a 53% stake, giving him considerable control. This structure limits the influence of other shareholders, including public investors. For more insights, you can explore the Growth Strategy of Asana.
The dual-class share structure concentrates voting power with insiders. This impacts how decisions are made within the company.
- Dustin Moskovitz holds a significant percentage of the voting power.
- The dual-class structure limits the influence of other shareholders.
- Understanding the ownership structure is key to understanding Asana's governance.
- Asana's ownership is a critical aspect of its company profile.
Asana Business Model Canvas
- Complete 9-Block Business Model Canvas
- Effortlessly Communicate Your Business Strategy
- Investor-Ready BMC Format
- 100% Editable and Customizable
- Clear and Structured Layout

What Recent Changes Have Shaped Asana’s Ownership Landscape?
Over the past few years, the ownership structure of Asana has remained relatively stable, with founders retaining significant control. As of June 12, 2024, individual insiders held approximately 63% of the company's shares. Dustin Moskovitz, one of the founders, holds a substantial 53% stake, highlighting strong insider influence. Justin Rosenstein is the second-largest shareholder, owning 8.6% of the common stock as of October 8, 2024.
Institutional investors also play a key role in Asana's ownership. As of June 12, 2025, there were 430 institutional owners holding a total of 77,375,811 shares. Key institutional shareholders include Vanguard Group Inc., Voya Investment Management LLC, and BlackRock, Inc. Voya Investment Management LLC held around 5.1% of the company's stock as of October 8, 2024. Despite significant institutional ownership, the dual-class share structure gives founders more voting power relative to their economic interest. For more insights, you can explore the Brief History of Asana.
Financially, Asana reported revenues of $187.3 million in Q1 fiscal year 2025 (ended April 30, 2025), reflecting a 9% year-over-year increase. The company achieved non-GAAP profitability for the first time in Q1 fiscal year 2025, with an EPS of $0.05. For the full fiscal year 2025 (ended January 31, 2025), revenues reached $723.9 million, an 11% increase from the previous year. Asana forecasts revenues for Q1 fiscal year 2026 to be between $184.5 million and $186.5 million, representing 7% to 8% year-over-year growth.
Key Ownership Details | Details | Date |
---|---|---|
Insider Ownership | Approximately 63% | June 12, 2024 |
Dustin Moskovitz Ownership | 53% | June 12, 2024 |
Justin Rosenstein Ownership | 8.6% | October 8, 2024 |
The ownership of Asana is characterized by a dual-class share structure, which gives founders like Dustin Moskovitz and Justin Rosenstein significant control.
Institutional investors hold a substantial portion of Asana's shares, with firms like Vanguard and BlackRock as major shareholders.
Asana's financial performance, including revenue growth and achieving profitability, influences investor sentiment and ownership trends.
The company continues to focus on product innovation, such as its AI Studio, which is expected to drive further adoption and revenue growth.
Asana Porter's Five Forces Analysis
- Covers All 5 Competitive Forces in Detail
- Structured for Consultants, Students, and Founders
- 100% Editable in Microsoft Word & Excel
- Instant Digital Download – Use Immediately
- Compatible with Mac & PC – Fully Unlocked

Related Blogs
- What are Mission Vision & Core Values of Asana Company?
- What is Competitive Landscape of Asana Company?
- What is Growth Strategy and Future Prospects of Asana Company?
- How Does Asana Company Work?
- What is Sales and Marketing Strategy of Asana Company?
- What is Brief History of Asana Company?
- What is Customer Demographics and Target Market of Asana Company?
Disclaimer
All information, articles, and product details provided on this website are for general informational and educational purposes only. We do not claim any ownership over, nor do we intend to infringe upon, any trademarks, copyrights, logos, brand names, or other intellectual property mentioned or depicted on this site. Such intellectual property remains the property of its respective owners, and any references here are made solely for identification or informational purposes, without implying any affiliation, endorsement, or partnership.
We make no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of any content or products presented. Nothing on this website should be construed as legal, tax, investment, financial, medical, or other professional advice. In addition, no part of this site—including articles or product references—constitutes a solicitation, recommendation, endorsement, advertisement, or offer to buy or sell any securities, franchises, or other financial instruments, particularly in jurisdictions where such activity would be unlawful.
All content is of a general nature and may not address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. It is not a substitute for professional advice or services. Any actions you take based on the information provided here are strictly at your own risk. You accept full responsibility for any decisions or outcomes arising from your use of this website and agree to release us from any liability in connection with your use of, or reliance upon, the content or products found herein.